Roku developer repositories moved from GitHub to GitLab

(blog.roku.com)

106 points | by cxr 1 hour ago

16 comments

  • rr808 49 minutes ago
    Worth mentioning that Roku is being acquired by Fox so in the virtue battle with Microsoft neither are clean
    • veryfancy 23 minutes ago
      “virtue battle”! like it
    • cramer4next 13 minutes ago
      For one that deal hasn't closed and secondly not sure what the connection is between Roku leaving Github and FOX. Please expand on relevance.
    • verdverm 30 minutes ago
      it seems like all the media companies are being bought up by a select few people

      does not portend good things for the future

      • alt227 12 minutes ago
        Especially judging by whats happening in the gaming industry right now. Mass layoffs everywhere from once leading lights in the industry, now acquired by big business and having to succumb to broad budget cuts.
      • robertfw 12 minutes ago
        for the future? this has already been happening for years and is a major reason we're in the predicament we're in
        • cwbriscoe 12 minutes ago
          What predicament are we in?
          • ozgrakkurt 6 minutes ago
            what is a predicament?
          • verdverm 7 minutes ago
            the greatest wealth concentration and inequity in american history, blatant corruption and nepotism

            an out of control, bipartisan oligarchy

            The majority of HN has been on the winning side of this equation, benefiting greatly from the rise of the computer, internet, and now Ai. This is not most people, we forget about them, we tell them it's their own fault when it is not. The game is not fair, it's rigged for most humans.

            Michael Sandel explains it better than I can yet

  • brightball 3 minutes ago
    I saw a big write up on using Dagger for CI no matter your git host and I was curious if there were any real benefits?
  • abc42 9 minutes ago
    Why is this important news?
    • zulban 1 minute ago
      A major software project is changing from one major software tool to another major software tool. How is it not important? Or at least notable for HN?
  • tangotaylor 1 hour ago
    I wish they would spill some tea and articulate why they moved.
    • gchamonlive 46 minutes ago
      Would also like a write-up. People assume it's just because of GitHub outages, but GitHub is slightly worse in every aspect, so for big projects and organisations it compounds to being quite messy to manage and operate.

      GitLab is thought-out to support larger groups with more complex pipelines, and while it's got it's own set of quirks, it doesn't begin to compare, GitHub in contrast seems like a toy forge for toy projects.

    • jeron 1 hour ago
      why? like having a dozen outages in the last couple months isn't a good enough reason why?
      • misnome 53 minutes ago
        GitLab is just as bad, just not as big so doesn't get the coverage. https://status.gitlab.com/pages/history/5b36dc6502d06804c083...

        And of course many people self-host which changes a lot of the equation (which you can also do with GitHub, but not for free - and FWIW our self-hosted premium gitlab has about an hour a day downtime, which we've been told by the team responsible is an unavoidable side-effect of backing up gitlab).

        • Volundr 28 minutes ago
          I was responsible for administering a self hosted GitLab instance for a medium sized company and our backups never required downtime. The built in backup command doesn't require downtime but also isn't a consistent point in time snapshot (specifically because the instance keeps running while the backup is being taken). If they've decided they need one for some reason, stopping GitLab is certainly the easiest way, but not the only way of accomplishing that goal, but that'll be true of any self-hosted forge, including GitHub.
          • icefo 11 minutes ago
            You could stop it, do a snapshot of the storage and backup that for <1 min of downtime probably.

            But at the same time, if you're not a global company, doing it at 3am is probably fine.

        • mcrowder65 33 minutes ago
          Weird. I’ve been on a self hosted enterprise gitlab and I think we’ve have only one or two performance degradations/outages in the past 6 years
      • tinyhouse 59 minutes ago
        No horse in this race but GitLab has been down a few times recently too.
      • prologic 1 hour ago
        Or Microsoft/OpenAI (and others) just blatantly scraping all your codebases and violating thousands of OSS licneses?
        • pjmlp 54 minutes ago
          If the repos are public, hosting location doesn't make a difference.
        • echelon 54 minutes ago
          We're going to need something more expansive than OSI software licenses for the future.

          Something like, "if you look at us, we must be able to look at you"

          • abc42 8 minutes ago
            How about "if you're not the customer, you're the product".
    • thirtyseven 26 minutes ago
      Roku uses Gitlab internally so could just be a standardization thing.
  • prologic 1 hour ago
    Did this back in ~2021 for my own repos :D https://prologic.blog/posts/2021-07-11-why-i-no-longer-trust...
  • pinkgolem 1 hour ago
    We did the same, quit happy
  • CyanLite2 1 hour ago
    GitLab will eventually just get overran with 24/7 agents spewing from their AI Slop Cannons
    • locknitpicker 5 minutes ago
      > GitLab will eventually just get overran with 24/7 agents spewing from their AI Slop Cannons

      That's fine. GitLab offers self-hosted solutions where companies run the service in their own infrastructure and limit who has access to it. The same cannot be said by GitHub, though.

      • slantedview 1 minute ago
        Wouldn't that be Github enterprise? It's been around since 2012 IIRC.
  • outfitx 1 hour ago
    Why? Any specific reasons?
    • jacquesm 1 hour ago
      Do you have some time?
      • rlonstein 57 minutes ago
        >> Why? Any specific reasons?

        > Do you have some time?

        Okay, I laughed.

  • skullone 1 hour ago
    The readme.md still says welcome to their GitHub repository :D
  • BatchJob 56 minutes ago
    I always found it wierd that people flocked to github. The app sucks, if I have to use it for work it infuriates me at nearly every turn with its sad excuse for UI. People like free sh*.

    As for gitlab...yuck. But whatever. Most of the dev tool space is really just "sh* we have to put up with now", none of it is any good, all of it is dated from the early aughts, and taken as a whole is even worse because none of it works together.

    While software development itself got better in the last ten years these tools stayed the same or got worse (enshittification). And this is part of why folks are self hosting.

    The other part is that AI is destroying the Internet and its time to pack your bags anyway. The smart people already have.

    • CodesInChaos 25 minutes ago
      > I always found it weird that people flocked to github.

      Same reason we ended up with git. Their predecessors were significantly worse, and then they had enough momentum to keep going.

    • locknitpicker 2 minutes ago
      > I always found (...)

      You broadcasted your negative feedback but it seems you had no positive remarks to give. If you feel everything is so bad, would you mind sharing what tolerable alternatives are there to GitHub and GitLab?

    • carlosjobim 30 minutes ago
      Well you're a developer. Why don't you make something better instead of complaining?
  • robinhood 58 minutes ago
    So they replaced a tool from an evil corporation by another one disguised as an open source project.
    • verandaguy 25 minutes ago

          > disguised as an open source project
      
      A software project either is or isn't open source. Gitlab CE is source-available (here: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab) with an MIT license, which is a permissive open-source license.

      Gitlab CE is open-source. There exist versions of Gitlab with features that require payment. This does not mean that Gitlab (the product) is not open-source; it means that Gitlab (the company) has a core product which is open-source, and then sustains its development through the sale of licenses to product tiers beyond that.

    • sidcool 58 minutes ago
      This logic baffles me. This would mean no one gets any work done and we go in a perennial cycle of victimhood
  • steffenfrost 1 hour ago
    A devops friend of mine said GitHub turned into a hot mess.
    • valyala 1 hour ago
      Because of unreviewed AI code at GitHub services?
      • cdmckay 1 hour ago
        Or maybe because the use of GitHub has skyrocketed?
  • neya 1 hour ago
    Good. I want everyone to do this. I want to see the downfall of Microsoft. Time and again they've proved that anything they touch can't be trusted nor reliable. I am tired of this. They even bully their users - on Mac OS, GitHub desktop doesn't respect the word "no". It installs all kinds of helpers and acts like borderline spyware. Someone created an issue about it on Github and the MS employees told them to fuck off in corporate[1]

    I am even considering hosting my own GIT server myself. Some of our deployments got affected multiple times in the last 6 months alone we were really caught off-guard. Thankfully our clients were understanding of the GitHub outages. But, this should not be the baseline. Reliability should not be the cost of doing business.

    [1] https://github.com/creativefoundrysg/desktop#an-open-letter-...

    • pjmlp 50 minutes ago
      Thanks for a good laugh, FOSS in 2026 is nothing without the money of big corporations, including Microsoft.

      Everyone spent years talking against GPL, business friendly licenses like MIT and Apache were the way of the future, not viral and co.

      Now we are here, most projects have their key contributors working at corporations like Microsoft, or gladly getting their acquisition money to pay the VCs, embrace your business friendly licenses.

    • valiant55 1 hour ago
      I'm hosting Forgejo for my homelab and couldn't be happier. I have everything running in containers with dind for CI/CD. Most of my workflows just worked with minimal changes. YMMV and this is far from an enterprises' needs but it's working great so far for my needs.
    • pixl97 57 minutes ago
      >Good. I want everyone to do this

      Every other free service would die nearly instantly, so maybe only want useful things to move to other services.

      >I am even considering hosting my own GIT server myself.

      It's mostly a good idea.... but, with the current security apocalypse we seem to be under making sure your own shit doesn't get pwned is a full time job. The level of security hostility on the internet recently has reached numbers I've never seen before. RCE's dropping about every day, more targeted scans than I've ever seen in my life, swarms of AI bots breaking into services.

      • sedan_baklazhan 54 minutes ago
        Running an up to date self hosted Gitea server takes like 5 minutes a week.
        • pixl97 11 minutes ago
          I mean, last year, but if you're updating once a week now, that means you've had 6 days to get exploited.
    • 999900000999 1 hour ago
      As an idea, do you think an enterprise only Git host would work.

      Say annual contracts start at 100k minimum and everyone gets a dedicated support engineer.

      You get your own rack. None of this degraded shared capability nonsense.

      Does that seem like a solid business ?

      • the__alchemist 1 hour ago
        Is that Bitbucket?
        • 999900000999 51 minutes ago
          Both GitLab and Bitbucket still offer free repos for hobbyists.

          What I'm thinking of is a company that exclusively caters to the enterprise.

          You get a support engineer and they help on everything, migration, CI/CD, hosting, etc.

          Nothing goes down without a solid 3 page write up.

    • to11mtm 1 hour ago
      Github desktop is such a hot mess that I instead choose to continue to suffer with SourceTree. Sourcetree annoys me for reasons I still cannot articulate after a decade, but it at least tends to actually work without being too intrusive as far as updating, doesn't randomly derp out on credentials, and is super handy when trying to visualize janky branch patterns of dev teams.
  • robswc 35 minutes ago
    GitHub is such a mess. They seem to be doing everything and nothing. GitLab is 100x better, in terms of DX. While I still have a soft spot for GH, its frustrating to use it when GL exists.
    • CodesInChaos 31 minutes ago
      Downtime aside, what do prefer about GitLab?